__MoBlack’s avatar__MoBlack’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,069

                  1. She says she's going to give a history lesson and everything in the history lesson part is wrong and easily disproven by... Google. @ArtValley818_/1290783453676478467
                1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
                  When the Nazis came into power in 1940 (it was actually 1933 but okay), they didn't "burn the flag". They replaced the current flag with their own? The Nazis didn't get rid of the "public police" they expanded the police. Does she think mutual aid groups rounded up Jews? Lmao
              1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
                The Nazis didn't need to create "domestic terrorist organizations" in 1940 to crush dissent. They... they controlled the state. They just used the state. That they controlled.
            1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
              The brownshirts existed when the Nazis were out of power. They were effectively replaced by the SS starting in 1934... because the Nazis, again, controlled the state and had no need for domestic terrorism, especially by 1940.
          1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
            While many Nazis were anti-Christian, the Nazis formed an alliance with religious conservatives in Germany, preferring to ally themselves with a version of Christianity they could control. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity
        1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
          The only Bibles the Nazis burned were the Torah. Cuz, y'know. Jews.
      1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
        The Nazis didn't "tear down statues" in a way that's comparable to anything going on now. They tore down "degenerate art". Statues venerating Germany's great past were celebrated, actually.
    1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
      The hypernationalist, anti-modern art, anti immigrant tenancies of this girl and her followers have more in common with the Nazis than whatever she imagines the "left" and "BLM" are.
  1. …in reply to @__MoBlack
    Honest question: do conservatives ever get tired of being constantly wrong? It has to take a lot of effort. A computer printing statements at random has at least some chance of saying something remotely true at one point.